Saturday, May 30, 2009

Pakistan tightens security after terror attacks

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan (CNN) -- Pakistani authorities increased security throughout the capital Friday after this week's deadly bombings in Lahore and Peshawar, and a threat by the Taliban to carry out further attacks.

Smoke billows from a fire at the site of a marketplace bomb in Peshawar, Pakistan, on Thursday.

1 of 2


var CNN_ArticleChanger = new CNN_imageChanger('cnnImgChngr','/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/05/29/pakistan.peshawar.blast/imgChng/p1-0.init.exclude.html',1,1);
//CNN.imageChanger.load('cnnImgChngr','imgChng/p1-0.exclude.html');
All vehicles must go through checkpoints before entering Islamabad, the city's deputy police inspector general Bin Yamin told CNN. Three people have been arrested in Islamabad in connection with the current threats, he said.
The Pakistani Taliban claimed responsibility for Wednesday's suicide attack in Lahore that killed 27 people. It also threatened to continue attacking cities in Pakistan until the military ends its operations against Taliban militants in the country's northwest.
There has been no claim of responsibility for the Thursday attacks in North West Frontier Province.
Officials said they believed bombers who killed 12 victims Thursday may have caused some of the blasts to lure people nearer before detonating further explosions.
The attacks targeted Dera Ismail Khan and the provincial capital, Peshawar, where government forces have waged a massive operation against Taliban militants.
The deadliest of the attacks occurred early Thursday evening. Timed explosive devices on two parked motorcycles detonated back-to-back, killing six people at two crowded adjacent bazaars, said Shafqat Malik, Peshawar bomb disposal squad chief.
Two children were among the dead, and at least 75 people were wounded. Three suspected militants were killed by police.
After the bazaar attacks, several of the suspects fled to a rooftop, where they fought a gunbattle against police. Three suspected militants were killed, police said.
The militants are going after both civilians and military targets, and some analysts believe Pakistan should prepare for more attacks as its military operation continues against the Taliban.
Don't Miss
Pakistan army spokesman fights media war
Taliban claims responsibility for Lahore suicide attack
Taliban seek return to peace deal in Pakistan
Refugees survive on food 'cows won't eat'
"This will increase to an extent because they (the militants) are on the run and when they are on the run they have to do something somewhere," military analyst Gen. Jamshed Ayaz Khan said.
The Pakistani military reported Friday that its forces killed 28 "terrorists" in the Swat region and apprehended seven others -- including several commanders -- in the past 24 hours. Four Pakistani soldiers died in a roadside bombing attack on Thursday near Mingora, the largest city in the Swat region, the military said.
The fighting has uprooted some 2.4 million Pakistanis from their homes in the northwestern region of the country, according to the latest data from the United Nations.
Peshawar police recovered two suicide vests and said they thought the attackers might have caused initial blasts to lure more people to the area before detonating additional explosives.
Thick smoke engulfed the streets after the attacks, and GEO-TV showed dazed people mingling and running amid burned-out vehicles and mounds of building debris. Firefighters doused flames, and other emergency workers scrambled to rescue people from rubble.
In another bombing Thursday, three policeman and one civilian were killed on the outskirts of Peshawar, authorities said.
Another suicide bombing occurred later in Dera Ismail Khan, the province's southernmost city. A police officer and a civilian were killed, authorities said. At least 12 were wounded.
Peshawar and Dera Ismail Khan are more than 250 kilometers (155 miles) apart.

New European astronaut reveals greatest fear


LONDON, England (CNN) -- He's a helicopter test pilot who spent 18 years in the British Army. He just beat more than 8,400 others to become one of Europe's newest astronauts, destined for the International Space Station.

Helicopter test pilot Tim Peake is about to venture a lot further as one of six new astronauts at the European Space Agency.

So what is Tim Peake most nervous about?
Learning Russian.
"That's an area that I think will probably be quite difficult for me," said Peake, 37, in an interview Friday with CNN.
It certainly speaks volumes about Peake's experience that he considers learning a language the hardest part of his new job.
His career in the British Army's Army Air Corps involved flying and teaching on helicopters in Germany, the United States, and Britain before becoming an experimental test pilot. He left the service this year having achieved the rank of major, though he is still a reservist.
Peake now works as a test pilot for helicopter designer and manufacturer AgustaWestmoreland, primarily doing flight testing on Apache and Lynx helicopters.
"We really get involved in an aircraft program from the drawing board right through to the first flight," Peake said. "You hope everything will go right, everything's been designed right ... but until you lift the aircraft off the ground, you're never quite sure what's going to happen."
This month, the European Space Agency chose Peake and five other Europeans to be its newest generation of space explorers. They will begin training later this year with the goal of completing future missions to the International Space Station (ISS).
The six were chosen from among 8,413 applicants and include another test pilot, one fighter pilot, a commercial pilot, and an engineer and a physicist. They come from Italy, Germany, Denmark, and France.
The selection process took a year and involved medical, psychological, and professional screening.
Don't Miss
Six new European astronauts prepare for final frontier
California landing ends shuttle's Hubble trip
Astronauts complete last Hubble spacewalk
Peake said there were tests on memory retention, math and engineering, coordination, and spacial awareness.
"They were the kind of tests where in some circumstances, if you were a perfectionist, you would have found it very frustrating because with a lot of them you couldn't complete them 100 percent," he said.
The applicants were tested on problem-solving and team-building before having an hour-long interview in front of a five-member panel.
After that came a week-long intensive medical exam that covered everything from ear, nose, throat and eyes to bone density.
"It was a very good mid-life review," Peake joked. And while he wasn't told the results of his medical test, "they did tell us that everything was fine."
Peake said he didn't think he'd gotten the job. The ESA was due to announce the winning applicants on May 20, but as the day approached, Peake said his phone went quiet.
"I hadn't heard anything for nearly four weeks, since my final interview, so as the time got closer to the final press conference ... I naturally assumed, well, it's not me," he said.
Then his phone rang. He saw the Paris number and figured it was a rejection. In fact, it was the ESA calling to tell him he'd been selected in what Peake says was "the biggest life-changing telephone call I've ever had in my life."
"It was just the most amazing feeling in the world," he said. "I was absolutely delighted. It's an incredibly privileged position to have."
Now that the media frenzy has subsided, Peake said, it's back to work. He still has his job at AgustaWestmoreland and must also find a place for his family to live in Cologne, Germany, for when training begins there in September.
Peake is married to Rebecca and they have a four-and-a-half-month-old son, Thomas.
The 18-month training is mostly technical but also involves Russian language courses so the astronauts can become fluent. Russian and English are the two official languages on the ISS.
At the end of the training, the six will be qualified astronauts, eligible for mission assignment. And once assigned to a mission, they will undergo two to three years of mission-specific training as a crew.
Peake said he's hoping to go on multiple missions to the ISS. Some may be the standard six-month missions while others may be shorter resupply stints, he said.
He's never been in space before and says he doesn't really know what to expect.
"I would imagine if it's anything like previous test flying I've done, when you get so embroiled into the training for a mission, it's almost as if you just let the training take over," he said. "However, I'm sure there will be a few moments when you might be able to take pause."
A veteran astronaut advised Peake not to forget to "look down and enjoy the view," he said.
"I think it will be one of the most beautiful sights that you could imagine," he said.

Wikipedia bans Church of Scientology

The collaborative online encyclopedia Wikipedia has banned the Church of Scientology from editing the site. The Register reports Wikipedia’s Arbitration Committee, or ArbCom, voted 10 to 0 in favor of the ban, which takes effect immediately.
Wikipedia’s innovative free-encyclopedia draws upon the knowledge of millions of users to create and edit articles on every conceivable topic. Edits appear immediately and do not undergo any formal peer-review process.
Wikipedia officially prohibits use of the encyclopedia to advance personal agendas – such as advocacy or propaganda and philosophical, ideological or religious dispute – but the open format makes enforcing such policies difficult.
According to Wikipedia administrators speaking to The Register:
Multiple editors have been “openly editing [Scientology-related articles] from Church of Scientology equipment and apparently coordinating their activities.”
However, Karin Pouw, with the Church of Scientology’s public affairs office, told me she is unaware of any coordinated effort to alter Wikipedia. Instead, she described the edits as individual attempts to correct inaccurate information by impassioned Scientologists and interpreted the ban as a typical Wikipedia response to arguments over content. She noted that even the U.S. Department of Justice received a temporary ban after someone erased references to a controversial scandal from inside the government agency.
One Wikipedia contributor I spoke with that was involved in the Scientology arbitration agreed that some of the edits coming from the church were justifiable, but insisted the ban was necessary after the church refused to follow Wikipedia’s policies:
“The edits coming out of Church of Scientology servers were of the sort that made their organization look better. Up to a point that’s justifiable, when it comes to correcting inaccuracies or removing poorly sourced negative information. There were times when they went beyond that and deleted well sourced information that was unflattering, and there were times when they insulted other editors in a manner that would reflect poorly upon any religion.”
Some see Wikipedia’s decision as a setback to the Utopian goal of Web 2.0 in which every user is allowed to freely contribute.
How do you feel about the ban? Should Wikipedia actively suppress self-serving, misleading or inaccurate information? Or does every voice deserve to be heard?

Three men hanged in Iran for mosque bombing

TEHRAN, Iran (CNN) -- Three men who were involved in the recent bombing of a mosque in the city of Zahedan were hanged Saturday, only two days after the explosion that killed and injured dozens of worshippers, according to Iran's judiciary.
A judiciary spokesman in the southeastern province of Sistan-Baluchestan told the state-run news agency IRNA that Haji Noti Zehi, Gholam Rasoul Shai Zehi and Zabihollah Naroubi had smuggled into the country the explosives used in Thursday's bombing in the Shia mosque of Amir al-Momenin.
Before the executions, Hojatoleslam Ebrahim Hamidi said: "These three traitors, who smuggled in the explosives and put them at the disposal of a terrorist played a major role in the murders," IRNA said.
The three were hanged in public just before the funerals of the people killed in the mosque Thursday.
"The three were charged with waging war (against God), corruption on earth and activities against the state. They were convicted and they had confessed to their crimes, and their role in smuggling explosives into the country had been proven," Hamidi told IRNA.
Reports on the number of casualties varied in Iranian reports. Some local agencies said more than 20 people were killed and 125 were wounded in the bombing.
He said the three had been arrested a few days before the actual bombing and their role in bringing in the explosives had been proven. The judiciary spokesman in Zahedan added: "Immediately after the mosque explosion, the cases of the three men were referred to a team from the judiciary who spent thirty hours investigating it. The three men were convicted of the charges after the due process of the law, including a state-appointed lawyer to defend them, was observed and the defendants were found guilty of all charges."
The spokesman added that the three men had been accused of several other crimes, including direct participation in a bus bombing three years ago in Zahedan and at least two other bombings, IRNA said.
Hamidi said that the three men had also been involved in four hostage taking incidents, had planned eight other hostage taking and terrorist operations that had been discovered by the police before they could be carried out.
Don't Miss
Deadly blast at Iranian mosque
"This file is not closed yet. They (men) were only a part of this plot, more culprits will be identified and punished in the near future," the judiciary spokesman said.
Hamidi said: "The enemy is now trying to sow dissension among the various tribes and sects and are trying to flame the fires through terrorist acts. While the country is preparing for the 10th presidential elections, the hand of world's arrogant powers is coming out through the sleeves of a bunch of traitors who ignore even the sanctity of mosques."
IRNA said Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Seyed Ali Khamenei, condemned the bombing and sent a message of sympathy to the victims' relatives.
"In his statement, he condemned the involvement of certain expansionist superpowers and their spying organizations in the plots against Muslim nations and between the followers of Islam's different sects and causing bloodshed among Muslim brothers in Iran and other regional countries," IRNA reported.
Ayatollah Ahmad Khatami, a hard-line cleric, also said there were signs that the United States and Israel were involved in the mosque bombing, IRNA reported.
The United States denied the allegations.
"The U.S. strongly condemns all forms of terrorism. We do not sponsor any form of terrorism in Iran. And we continue to work with the international community to try to prevent any attacks against innocent civilians anywhere," State Department spokesman Ian Kelly told reporters in a Friday briefing.

King: Same-sex marriage debate heats up in New York


Editor's note: On CNN's "State of the Union," host and chief national correspondent John King goes outside the Beltway to report on the issues affecting communities across the country.

Christine Quinn, speaker of the New York City Council, and her partner Kim Catullo talk to John King.

1 of 4


var CNN_ArticleChanger = new CNN_imageChanger('cnnImgChngr','/2009/POLITICS/05/29/sotu.same.sex/imgChng/p0-0.init.exclude.html',3,0);
//CNN.imageChanger.load('cnnImgChngr','imgChng/p1-0.exclude.html');
NEW YORK (CNN) -- As she lobbies members of the New York Senate these days, the politician in Christine Quinn can understand what the gay rights activist in her sometimes cannot.
"The fear of the unknown," is how she describes it. "This is a vote they've never cast before. And they don't know how people are going to react. You are in a position where people's reaction to you is the key to your success. And the unknown creates fear and fear often creates paralysis."
Quinn is the openly gay speaker of the New York City Council, and a proponent of legalizing same sex marriage in New York state.
"It is really encouraging to see what's happening around the country in places where you really wouldn't expect it, like Iowa," says Quinn's longtime partner, Kim Catullo. "To be in a place like New York and not have it just doesn't seem to make sense."
The New York Assembly passed legislation allowing same-sex marriages earlier this month, and the question now is whether there are enough votes in the state Senate to pass the legislation before the legislature adjourns for the year.
Quinn, who spent time in Albany this past week meeting with undecided senators, is cautiously optimistic.
Don't Miss
King: Luck running low in Las Vegas
King: Bad economy puts families on the streets
King: Flu and politics dominate
King: GOP tries to get back on track
"It was amazing how much openness there was," she said of private meetings with lawmakers who are undecided and even a few who have said they are likely to oppose the legislation. "We just all have to create a moment for them to step forward. So I really think it is going to happen this month, before the legislative session is over."
Maggie Gallagher sees the Senate math quite differently.
"We are now working in 24 Senate districts," says Gallagher, president of the National Organization for Marriage, which opposes same-sex marriages. "We know we have generated thousands of phone calls to legislators. I don't think they will be passing a gay marriage bill this session."
The New York legislation is part of a growing national debate, and one which will gain even more attention because of the U.S. Supreme Court vacancy and the nomination of federal appeals court judge Sonia Sotomayor to fill it.
"Not tomorrow. Not likely in the coming year unless the courts move dramatically faster than we are used to seeing them move," is how Columbia Law School Professor Suzanne Goldberg answers when asked when the issue of same-sex marriage is likely to make the Supreme Court docket. "But certainly some time in the next couple of years we're likely to see the Supreme Court issue a position or two on this issue."
Goldberg knows Sotomayer well; the judge is also a lecturer at Columbia.
"We've never spoken about the issue," Goldberg told us. "I have no inside information about her views. What I would say is that she is both a wise person and a thoughtful person and being wise and thoughtful are the right ingredients for reaching what to me is the right answer on this issue, which to me is that equality applies to all people."
The likelihood of the issue reaching the Supreme Court in the next year or two raises the stakes in the state battles.
'State of the Union'
John King reinvents Sunday talk: more time for more politics.Sunday, 9 a.m. ET
see full schedule »
Opponents of California's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage vow to try again in 2010 in hopes of a different result. A new federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of California's Proposition 8 was filed this week and could well be among the cases that make it to the Supreme Court eventually.
Five states now allow same-sex marriage: Maine, Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts and Vermont, and the states with active debates include California, New York, New Jersey and New Hampshire.
In an interview in their apartment in the Chelsea neighborhood of New York, Quinn and Catullo agreed the ideal solution for them would be federal recognition of the right of same-sex couples to marry.
But the federal Defense of Marriage Act signed by President Clinton defines marriage as between a man and a woman. And President Obama says he supports civil unions and other benefits for same-sex couples but opposes marriage.
"He's not perfect on this issue and I want him to be perfect," Quinn said of Obama. "And I'm fairly certain that pretty soon he will be perfect on this issue and what we just have to do is keep talking to him and keep educating him and keep working on him."
"It doesn't help," Catullo says of Obama's opposition. Still, like Quinn, she hopes eventually, "he can evolve."
Gallagher, of the National Organization for Marriage, is worried more about the high court than any pressure on Obama from gay rights activists.
"Well I don't believe David Souter was on our side on the gay marriage issue although we don't know for sure," Gallagher said. So in her line of speculating, swapping Sotomayor for Souter isn't likely to swing the court in any major way. Her major worry is if one of the more conservative judges decided to retire in the near future.
"I don't think this one is going to tip the balance," Gallagher said. "But we're very close. We're probably only one Supreme Court justice away from a nationally imposed right to same-sex marriage whether we like it or not. That is the ultimate game plan of the gay marriage forces."
Catullo would prefer a conversation less political.
"I really do believe that if someone lived next to us or really knew us, it wouldn't be an issue at all," she said. "I mean we are good people. We're law-abiding. We're taxpayers. We're just an eight-year couple that's been together a long time and we do a lot of the things that a normal couple does. There's a lot more things in the world to worry about than the fact that we want to be married."

Obama creates top job for guarding online security


WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Obama announced Friday he is creating the post of cyber security coordinator to oversee "a new comprehensive approach to securing America's digital infrastructure."

President Obama announces Friday the creation of the post of cyber security coordinator.

The president said he will personally select the person who takes on that post.
"I'll depend on this official in all matters relating to cyber security, and this official will have my full support and regular access to me as we confront these challenges," he said.
The economic crisis cannot be tackled without ensuring the safety of the nation's online activities, Obama said. "America's economic prosperity in the 21st century will depend on cyber security," he said.
"Our technological advantage is a key to America's military dominance," he added. "But our defense and military networks are under constant attack. Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups have spoken of their desire to unleash a cyber attack on our country -- attacks that are harder to detect and harder to defend against."
The country is not adequately prepared, he said, to defend against a possible "weapon of mass disruption." Watch Obama's announcement »
"From now on ... the networks and computers we depend on every day will be treated as they should be: as a strategic national asset," Obama said. "Protecting this infrastructure will be a national security priority."
Don't Miss
Hackers steal info on newest fighter jet
Hackers reportedly embed code in power grid
Obama vowed that these efforts "will not include monitoring private sector networks or Internet traffic. We will preserve and protect the personal privacy and civil liberties that we cherish as Americans."
"I know how it feels" to have online privacy violated, the president said.
He referred to last year's hacking of computers at his campaign headquarters. The hackers did not access databases containing information about campaign donors, but did gain access to policy position papers and travel plans, Obama said.
CNN reported in November that computers at the headquarters of Obama's rival for the presidency, Sen. John McCain, had been broken into with similar results.
Obama's announcement Friday followed a 60-day review of the government's cyber security efforts, conducted by the National Security Council and Homeland Security Council.
The results of the review are posted at www.whitehouse.gov, along with links to more than 100 documents that helped inform the review.
The military has said it is working to create a Cyber Command. Last month, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said the command would initially be under the U.S. Strategic Command.
The president is expected, within weeks, to sign a classified order officially creating the command, defense officials told CNN.
The Department of Homeland Security reports the number of cyber attacks on government and private networks increased from 4,095 in 2005 to 72,065 in 2008.
This month, a Transportation Department audit -- carried out after hackers got into a support system containing personnel records -- indicated the nation's air-traffic control system could be at risk.

Why our 'amazing' science fiction future fizzled


(CNN) -- At the 1964 New York World's Fair, people stood in line for hours to look at a strange sight.

If only the future looked like "Star Trek," with its nifty gadgets that seem to solve every problem.

1 of 2


var CNN_ArticleChanger = new CNN_imageChanger('cnnImgChngr','/2009/TECH/science/05/29/jetpack/imgChng/p1-0.init.exclude.html',1,1);
//CNN.imageChanger.load('cnnImgChngr','imgChng/p1-0.exclude.html');
They wanted to see the "Futurama," a miniaturized replica of a typical 21st century American city that featured moving sidewalks, computer-guided cars zipping along congestion-free highways and resort hotels beneath the sea.
Forty years later, we're still waiting for those congestion-free highways -- along with the jet pack, the paperless office and all those "Star Trek"-like gadgets that were supposed to make 21st-century life so easy.
Daniel Wilson has been waiting as well. He's looked at the future we imagined for ourselves in pulp comic books, old science magazines and cheesy sci-fi movies from the 1950s, and came up with one question.
Why isn't the future what it used to be?
"I feel entitled to have all this technology that's been promised at a certain time," says Wilson, author of "Where's My Jetpack?" "I look up and say, 'Where's all this stuff?' ''
Some of that futuristic stuff, it turns out, is already here.
Visionaries actually invented objects like flying cars, but they could never work out the real world applications, Wilson says. Other inventions had the same problem. Ordinary people didn't want to have anything to do with them.
These futuristic follies include everything from "Smell-O-Vision," an invention that helped moviegoers smell as well as see movies; Sanyo's "ultrasonic ultra-squeaky clean human washing machine" (it was dubbed the "human washing machine," but wouldn't fit in an ordinary bathroom) and, of course, the jet pack.
"Scientists are OK at predicting what technology is going to happen in the future," Wilson says. "They're really bad at predicting how it's going to affect us."
What happened to my jet pack?
The jet pack is a perfect example of predicting the future, Wilson says. He says the jet pack first appeared in 1928 in an Amazing Stories comic book, which featured the hero Buck Rogers zooming though the sky in a jet pack.
The jet pack was actually developed by 1961, Wilson says. An inventor mounted a rocket onto a backpack and called it a rocket belt. A variation of the rocket belt even appeared in the 1965 James Bond movie, "Thunderball."
Today, the jet pack continues to grab inventors' imaginations.
A daredevil wearing a jet pack flew across a 1,500-foot-wide canyon in Colorado in November. A Swiss pilot, dubbed "Fusion Man," flew across the English Channel last year using a single jet-propelled wing. And a New Zealand inventor recently invented a jet pack, which weighs about 250 pounds, that reportedly can run for 30 minutes.
The jet pack, though, has never really taken off, Wilson says. The problem is its practical application. While a rocket belt could propel a screaming human to 60 mph in seconds, its fuel lasted for only about half a minute, "which led to more screaming," Wilson says.
The military couldn't find a useful application for it either. A soldier with a jet pack might look cool, but he's an easy target. Nor could a jet pack be of use to ordinary people who wanted to avoid rush-hour traffic, Wilson says. Jet-packing hordes could transform the skies into an aerial demolition derby, with air rage and drunk drivers turned into wobbly human torpedoes.
Yet other bold visions of the future have come true. Remember Rosey the Robot? That was the name of the robotic maid that waited on the Jetsons, the popular cartoon family from the future.
Rosey has become "Wakamaru." That's the name of a 3-foot-tall robot with a goofy grin that the Mitsubishi conglomerate in Japan invented to assist elderly people at home by doing everything from reminding them to take their medicine to looking out for burglars. Wakamaru can recognize faces and up to 10,000 words, Wilson says.
"Beam me Up Scotty," is a tagline from another television show, "Star Trek". But teleportation has been invented, Wilson says. He says a group of international scientists successfully transported a photon -- a bundle of electromagnetic energy -- from one side of a room to another in 1993. Physicists routinely conduct teleportation experiments today, Wilson says.
"Teleporting anything, even elementary particles, is mind-blowing," Wilson says. "Why is it that most people don't know it exists? It hasn't been put into practice yet. In real life, it's always about, 'What can you do for me?' "
A darker view of technology's future
People's fascination with technology's imprint on the future didn't start, however, in the mid-20th century with shows like "The Jetsons" or "Star Trek."
Joseph Corn, co-author of "Yesterday's Tomorrows: Past Visions of the American Future," found an inflated optimism about technology's impact on the future as far back as the 19th century, when writers like Jules Verne ("Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea") were creating wondrous versions of the future.
Even then, people had a misplaced faith in the power of inventions to make life easier, Corn says.
For example, the typical 19th-century American city was crowded and smelly. The problem was horses. They created traffic jams, filled the streets with their droppings and, when they died, their carcasses.
But around the turn of the 20th century, Americans were predicting that another miraculous invention would deliver them from the burden of the horse and hurried urban life -- the automobile, Corn says.
"There were a lot of predictions associated with early automobiles," Corn says. "They would help eliminate congestion in the city and the messy, unsanitary streets of the city."
Corn says Americans' faith in the power of technology to reshape the future is due in part to their history. Americans have never accepted a radical political transformation that would change their future. They prefer technology, not radical politics, to propel social change.
"Technology has been seen by many Americans as a way to get a better tomorrow without having to deal with revolutionary change," Corn says.
Today, however, a more sober view of technology has sneaked into the nation's popular culture. In dystopian sci-fi films like "Blade Runner," and "Terminator," technology creates more problems than it solves.
"Battlestar Galactica,'' the recent television series, is a prime example. It depicts a world where human beings have created amazing technology that has brought them to the precipice of extinction. There's no Buck Rogers zooming blissfully through the sky.
The show follows the journey of a group of humans who created a race of robots called Cylons. The Cylons rebel, virtually wipe out humanity with nuclear weapons, and pursue the survivors through space.
Mark Verheiden, a Battlestar writer, says the show's writers pay attention to current events when plotting their story lines. The contemporary world is filled with the unintended consequences of technology, he says.
"There are so many things you can't anticipate when you create a new technology," he says. "Who would have predicted that the Internet would be taking down shopping malls and wiping out newspapers?''
In Battlestar's finale, human beings abandon their faith in technology's ability to improve the future. They destroy their fancy machines and start again as simple hunter-gatherers.
"At some point, you can't expect a miracle to come in the form of technology to save us," Verheiden says. "At some point, the miracle has to come from a change in attitude and a new outlook."
That doesn't mean, however, that Verheiden isn't a fan of imagining future technology. He says he grew up watching "Star Trek" and immersing himself in Futurama-like exhibits.
The elevated cities and the "Star Trek" voyages of yesteryear may now seem corny, but at least they show humanity has a future, he says.
" 'Star Trek' was saying [that] a thousand years from now, people [will] figure out how to get along," Verheiden says. "In some ways, sci-fi says that the future is still optimistic, because no matter how bleak things are, it suggests that we're still here."

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

California high court upholds same-sex marriage ban


SAN FRANCISCO, California (CNN) -- California's highest court upheld a voter-approved ban on same-sex marriages Tuesday but allowed about 18,000 unions performed before the ban to remain valid.

Protesters gather outside the California Supreme Court in San Francisco on Tuesday.

1 of 4


var CNN_ArticleChanger = new CNN_imageChanger('cnnImgChngr','/2009/US/05/26/california.same.sex.marriage/imgChng/p1-0.init.exclude.html',3,1);
//CNN.imageChanger.load('cnnImgChngr','imgChng/p1-0.exclude.html');
Supporters of November ballot initiative Proposition 8 hailed the ruling, but about 1,000 advocates of same-sex marriages who gathered outside the court building in San Francisco met the 6-1 decision with chants of "Shame on you."
Following the ruling, supporters of same-sex marriage took to the streets to protest.
CNN affiliate KGO reported that after the opinion was made public lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender officers were brought in specifically to help manage the crowd.
During those protests 159 adults and three juveniles were arrested and cited for jaywalking, San Francisco Police Department Sgt. Lyn Tomioka told CNN.
Similar rallies were held Tuesday evening in Los Angeles, where 3,500 to 5,000 protesters took part, according to police estimates. There were no arrests, said Julianne Sohn of the Los Angeles Police Department.
There were also reports of demonstrations in San Diego and some other California cities, as well as in major cities nationwide. iReport.com: Rally in San Diego
Lisa Angelot and Karen Brandenberger were married when it was legal, but they said their own marriage is not enough, and told KGO they were prepared to be arrested to make the point.
"It will be my first time to be arrested," Angelot told KGO.
Many supporters said it was most upsetting to have the right to marry yanked away from them after last year's court ruling.
"It is impossible to square the elation that we felt just a year ago with the grief that we feel today," said Kate Kendell, head of the National Center for Lesbian Rights. "And it is impossible to reconcile the court's ruling from a year ago with its upholding of Proposition 8 today."
The same court, dominated by Republican appointees, ruled in May 2008 that the state constitution guaranteed gay and lesbian couples the "basic civil right" to marry. Voters responded in November by approving the marriage ban by a margin of 52 to 48 percent. iReport.com: React to court decision and share photos, video
Opponents of the ban argued that it improperly altered California's constitution to restrict a fundamental right guaranteed in the state charter. Its supporters argued that Californians long have had the right to change their state constitution through ballot initiatives.
Tuesday's ruling found that the proposition restricted the designation of marriage "while not otherwise affecting the fundamental constitutional rights of same-sex couples," as Chief Justice Ronald George wrote.
In a dissenting opinion, Justice Carlos Moreno -- the court's only Democratic appointee -- wrote that the decision "is not just a defeat for same-sex couples, but for any minority group that seeks the protection of the equal protection clause of the California Constitution." Watch what was at stake »
The decision sparked protests in San Francisco, Los Angeles and San Diego.
"It's nice that my marriage is still intact, but that's not the point," said Kathleen White, who was among those awaiting the ruling in San Francisco. "The point is that everybody should have the same civil rights across the board."
But Miles McPherson, pastor of the Rock Church in San Diego, said the court "did the right thing."
Voters in 28 other states have approved constitutional bans on same-sex marriages, and none has been rejected, he said.
"God didn't create the family that way," McPherson said. "You can't have a family with a mother and a mother, because [children] need a mother and a father to nurture their personality and their character."
Don't Miss
KTVU: Decision sparks protests, arrests
Will more states favor same-sex marriage?
N.H. House, governor at odds over same-sex vows
CNN poll: Generations disagree on issue
Tony Perkins, president of the conservative Family Research Council, said the ruling "should encourage pro-family activists not only in California but across the country." But he said that by preserving marriages performed before the ban, the justices could have opened a door to a possible appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
It was unclear whether advocates had an avenue to appeal Tuesday's ruling, however. And Dennis Herrera, San Francisco's city attorney, said the fight for same-sex marriage rights would most likely go on "in the electoral arena."
"Today we're faced with a disappointing decision," Herrera said. "But I think we also know it could have been worse." View reactions to the ruling »
A new effort, dubbed Yes on Equality, has begun working to place an initiative on the 2010 ballot that would repeal Proposition 8.
State justices left unaddressed whether same-sex marriages performed in other states before the ban was adopted would be recognized in California, and advocates would have to argue that the measure violated their rights under the U.S. Constitution for the U.S. Supreme Court to take up the case.
California took its first steps toward recognizing same-sex marriages in 2004, when San Francisco began issuing marriage licenses to gay and lesbian couples. iReport.com: React to court decision and share photos, video
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who opposed the initiative, praised the court for leaving the previous marriages intact and urged opponents of the decision to respond "peacefully and lawfully."
"While I believe that one day either the people or courts will recognize gay marriage, as governor of California, I will uphold the decision of the California Supreme Court," Schwarzenegger said in a written statement.
Four states -- Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts and Iowa -- currently allow same-sex marriages. A Vermont law making such marriages legal will take effect in September. And the District of Columbia voted May 5 to recognize same-sex marriages performed elsewhere, though it does not itself give marriage licenses to same-sex couples.

Pakistan: Massive blast destroys police building


ISLAMABAD, Pakistan (CNN) -- A well-coordinated attack involving gunmen and an explosives-packed van reduced a police building to rubble in the eastern Pakistani city of Lahore on Wednesday.

The scene of an apparent suicide car bomb attack on a police building in Lahore on May 27.

1 of 2


var CNN_ArticleChanger = new CNN_imageChanger('cnnImgChngr','/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/05/27/lahore.blast/imgChng/p1-0.init.exclude.html',1,1);
//CNN.imageChanger.load('cnnImgChngr','imgChng/p1-0.exclude.html');
Amid the confusion and the chaos in Pakistan's second-largest city, various officials offered conflicting casualty counts -- with almost all agreeing that at least 23 were killed. Most were police officers and staffers.
The blast also wounded more than 250, with one hospital -- Sir Ganga Ram, itself damaged by the explosion -- alone treating 128 victims.
Authorities expected the death toll to rise as rescue workers pick through twisted metal and other debris, looking for more bodies. Watch more on the attack »
The attack comes amid a Pakistani military offensive to remove militants from their haven in the northwestern part of the country.
Baitullah Mehsud, the leader of the Pakistan Taliban, had threatened to target major Pakistani cities if the operations did not cease.
"The enemies of Pakistan are trying their very best to use every venue to destabilize the country," Interior Minister Rehman Malik told reporters Wednesday.
The blast occurred on Mall Road near the city police headquarters and the high court. It is one of Lahore's busiest areas.
A passenger van, laden with explosives, broke through a security barrier and was headed toward the police building when guards opened fire to stop it, said Lahore's district coordination officer, Sajjad Ahmed Bhutta.
The two sides exchanged gunfire, with the attackers hurling grenades, said Faisal Gulzar, a deputy police superintendent. Watch rescue workers respond to the scene »
The van exploded before it could reach the building. It was carrying an estimated 100 kg (220 pounds) of explosives, Bhutta said.
The impact was immense, with the targeted building collapsing. It housed the city's rapid response team, which is dispatched during emergencies.
Don't Miss
Taliban seek return to peace deal in Pakistan
Refugees survive on food 'cows won't eat'
Pakistan intensifies offensive against militants in northwest
Pakistan court allows Nawaz Sharif to run for office
At least 50 people were thought to have been inside the two-story building at the time, said police spokesman Ray Nazar Hayat.
The police headquarters that sits adjacent to the building was also damaged, with motorcycles from a nearby dealership strewed about and charred by the heat.
The roof of four operating rooms caved at Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, with 40 medical staff members suffering minor wounds.
Police waved away onlookers in vain. Many of them jumped over the collapsed walls of the destroyed building to look for survivors. Semi-conscious officers in blood-stained uniforms were pulled from under wooden planks.
Immediately after, police arrested two suspects, said City Commissioner Khusro Pervez.
Local television showed the men being led away by a phalanx of officers.
No group immediately claimed responsibility for the attack, with suspicion falling on the beleaguered Islamic militants in the northwest who had vowed revenge.
"We're doing our best," Malik, the interior minister, said of the offensive in the northwest. "Please do not forget we're in a state of insurgency. It's a fight for our survival. We had two choices: We surrender our country or we save it for our next generation."
Lahore is Pakistan's cultural capital, far removed from the fundamentalist interpretation of Islam that is embraced in the north of the country, which borders Afghanistan.
Still, it has sporadically been swept into widening Islamist violence that grips the country.
In March, gunmen hurled grenades and opened fire on officers at a police training center, killing at least seven cadets.
The same month, gunmen opened fire on a bus carrying members of the Sri Lankan national cricket team on their way to a stadium for a match. The attack wounded at least eight members of the team and killed a driver and six Pakistani police officers.
"Everywhere in the city is insecurity," Haris Nadeem, a student in Lahore, said Wednesday. "You never know when a blast is going to occur or where. A shopping center? A government office?"
Still, said Saleem Khan, residents forge ahead.
"We will avoid places when they are crowded, but we can't change everything," he said. "We can't stop going out of our houses. Life has to go on."

Monday, May 25, 2009

US delegation lauds Kamal for city’s uplift

KARACHI: The US Trade and Development Agency Country Manager for South Asia Jacob Flewelling, US Consulate Specialist Malik Muhammad Atiq and Council of Economic Affairs’s Mary Elizebeth called on City Nazim Mustafa Kamal in the evening on Saturday.The delegation was briefed in detail about the city’s development; the members lauded Kamal for his great contribution to the development of the city and remarked that investors from across the globe are intending to come to the city because of its vast potential and geostrategic importance.Kamal informed the delegation about the city’s mega projects and said that although various impediments were witnessed in the way of completion and maintenance of the city’s projects, the City District Government Karachi (CDGK) successfully addressed the neglected issues faced by the citizens of the city.He told the delegation that it was a tedious job to initiate mega projects in the city, especially those relating to water and sewerage infrastructures and the Signal Free Corridors (SFC) while the land mafia had illegally occupied some of the land owned by the CDGK, which was causing problems in the initiation and completion of several projects.The Bagh-e-Ibn-e-Qasim was one such project; previously, the park measured a total of 130-acres and was fully encroached upon, however, the CDGK recovered the land and offered a dedicated park to the citizens of the city, revealed Kamal, adding that similarly, the SFC-III was almost an impossible task but it is now nearing completion. He went on to say that the vehicle parking issues in Saddar Town was also a giant issue that the CDGK resolved by constructing a seven-storey parking plaza there. The CDGK invested Rs 300 billion in making Karachi into a developed city of the world while Rs 30 billion were spent on laying water and sewerage infrastructure because no arrangements of the sort were previously available despite the rapid growth of the city’s population.It is on record that the CDGK has resolved issues that were never given importance for the past 60 years in only three and a half years, added Kamal.It is for the first time in the history of Pakistan that the islands of the city that were deprived of the basic water and sewerage facilities for last three centuries have now been facilitated with water lines worth millions of rupees, claimed Kamal.

‘Govt should nationalise KESC’

KARACHI: MQM’s Rabita Committee has urged the government to review the privatisation of the Karachi Electric Supply Company (KESC) and nationalise the utility immediately. In a statement, the committee criticised the KESC for the prolonged power outages in Karachi and demanded that the government take concrete steps to relieve the citizens. “Unannounced load shedding by the KESC authorities has disturbed the citizens’ routine life. Industrial and commercial activities in the city have also been badly affected due to the 10-12 hours of non-supply of electricity,” the statement read. staff report

General sales tax rate may be raised to 17 percent in budget

ISLAMABAD (May 25 2009): The government may increase standard rate of general sales tax (GST) from 16 percent to 17 percent across the board in the upcoming 2009-10 budget to generate additional revenue for meeting the enhanced collection target in the next fiscal year.Sources told Business Recorder on Saturday that the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) is likely to propose to the Ministry of Finance to raise sales tax rate by one percent on all items to meet revenue requirements in the next fiscal year. If the government agrees with the proposal, it would be a major revenue generation measure for improving sales tax collection which is an indirect tax, defined as one with a greater incidence on the poor relative to the rich.The standard rate of value-added tax (VAT) in the UK is 15 percent with effect from December 1, 2008 until 31 December 2009. The rate will revert to 17.5 percent with effect from January 1, 2010. The standard rate of VAT in Ireland is 21.5 percent.The standard rate of VAT in Belgium is 21 percent; Bulgaria 20 percent; Denmark 25 percent; Germany 19 percent; France 19.6 percent; Italy 20 percent; Netherlands 19 percent; Austria 20 percent; Poland 22 percent; Portugal 20 percent; Romania 19 percent; Finland 22 percent and the standard rate of VAT in Sweden is 25 percent.As far as India is concerned, VAT was introduced in India on April 1, 2005, at a rate of 12.5 percent. Various states like Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Kerala, Delhi and Haryana have introduced VAT on certain goods and services with different tax slabs specified in schedules in their respective statutes. Though 12.5 percent VAT is a low rate, there is also "central sales tax" and "service tax" applicable on various goods and services respectively.From the foregoing, it is evident that developed countries, with high income levels and low levels of extreme poverty, high sales tax rate is the norm. Be that as it may, Pakistan may rely on raising this tax as a way to increase its revenue as it is expected to be (i) more acceptable than say tax on the income of rich farmers, and (ii) the mechanism for its collection is already in place.The FBR may generate an additional amount, over and above Rs 26 billion, in 2009-10 following raise in GST from 16 percent to 17 percent. If the proposal is considered by the Finance Ministry, section 3 of the Sales Tax Act 1990 requires amendment through Finance Bill 2009-10 to upward revise the sales tax rate on import and local supply of all items/services liable to this levy.According to sources, the existing 16 percent sales tax might be adjusted upward, depending on the final decision of Finance Ministry. However, the proposal has been drafted at the FBR level to increase sales tax rate in the coming budget.It is worth mentioning that the government had increased sales tax rate from 15 percent to 16 percent in the budget for fiscal year 2008-09. As sales tax on provincial services is charged under the Sales Tax Act, 1990, the rate of tax on provincial services was also brought in line with the provision of Sales Tax Act, 1990. The sales tax on provincial services was also increased from 15 percent to 16 percent from 2008-09.The FBR had also increased sales tax from 20 percent to 21 percent on the import and local supply of 70 industrial inputs/raw materials and raised sales tax from 17.5 percent to 18.5 percent on nine items during the budget 2008-09. As the standard rate of sales tax was increased from 15 percent to 16 percent, this necessitated a sales tax rate increase from 17.5 percent to 18.5 percent and from 20 percent to 21 percent

India faces greater threat from China than Pakistan

NEW DELHI (May 25 2009): India faces a greater threat from China than Pakistan because New Delhi knows little about Beijing's combat capabilities, India's air force chief told a newspaper in an interview published on Sunday.The world's two most populous nations fought a brief but brutal war over their 3,500 km (2,200 mile) Himalayan border in 1962, and both sides claim the other is occupying big but largely uninhabited chunks of their territory. India has also been pursuing closer relations with the United States, something that worries China.China has a standing army almost three times the size of Pakistan's, according to official figures and defence industry estimates, but it is the lack of knowledge about China's military that concerned Air Chief Marshal Fali Homi Major. "We know very little about the actual capabilities of China, their combat edge or how professional their military is," Major told the Hindustan Times newspaper."They are certainly a greater threat." Although India and China have signed a treaty to maintain "peace and tranquility" along their disputed frontier and agreed to find a political solution to the row, talks have hardly made progress even as their business ties boom.India blames the lack of progress on China's claim over the north-eastern state of Arunachal Pradesh, in particular over its Buddhist enclave of Tawang. New Delhi says it cannot part with populated areas to settle the border dispute. Major said the Indian air force was upgrading about five airbases, of which two would operate Russian Su-30 MKI fighters.

JSQM calls strike against IDPs arrival, MQM de-links


KARACHI (updated on: May 25, 2009, 13:37 PST): Shops in Karachi closed Monday, witnesses said, after nationalists called a strike to protest the arrival of refugees from the conflict-hit northwest.A leader of the MQM said they did not back the strike action, but voiced concern at the handling of the influx of internally displaced persons (IDPs).The Jeay Sindh Qaumi Mahaz (JSQM) movement, which promotes the cause of natives of Sindh province, opposes the influx of ethnic Pashtuns fleeing a military offensive in three northwest districts.Security forces are currently locked in battle with Taliban militants in the Swat valley, and more than 1.7 million people have fled the conflict-hit region since the assault began late last month."We don't see it as just an issue of helping the displaced people," said Abdul Wahid Aresar, who heads the JSQM."The motive behind their arrival in the southern-most part of Pakistan from the north is to marginalise the native Sindhis, which we will resist."Residents of Karachi said that only a small number of the displaced were arriving in the city, and most were staying with relatives."We don't support this strike call but yes, we want the IDP issue to be managed properly," said Shoaib Bokhari. "We have not stopped the IDPs' arrival in Sindh, but they should be registered and kept in camps outside our cities."It was the second strike called by JSQM. Shops also shut on Saturday.Provincial home minister Zulfiqar Mirza said the authorities had issued "shoot-on-sight" orders in case of an outbreak of violence, but the city remained calm and peaceful.More than half of the shops and marketplaces in Karachi -- Pakistan's largest city -- remained closed Monday, while attendance in government and private offices was sparse and fewer vehicles than normal plied the roads."We have received no report of disturbances," city police chief Waseem Ahmed told AFP.The city's stock market was open, port operations were running as usual and flight operations for international and domestic destinations were uninterrupted, officials said.

Thursday, May 7, 2009

Lawmakers approve same-sex marriage in N.H., MaineStory Highlights


(CNN) -- Lawmakers voted in favor of same-sex marriage in New Hampshire and Maine on Wednesday, leaving Rhode Island as the only other New England state without legislation in favor of the issue.

Maine Gov. John Baldacci signed a bill Wednesday legalizing same-sex marriage.

Maine Gov. John Baldacci signed his state's same-sex marriage bill less than an hour after the legislature approved it.
"I have come to believe that this is a question of fairness and of equal protection under the law, and that a civil union is not equal to civil marriage," Baldacci, a Democrat, said in a statement released as he signed the bill.
But he raised the possibility that the citizens of the state would overturn the law, saying: "Just as the Maine Constitution demands that all people are treated equally under the law, it also guarantees that the ultimate political power in the state belongs to the people."
It was not immediately clear whether New Hampshire Gov. John Lynch, a Democrat who has questioned the need for such legislation, would sign the bill passed Wednesday by the legislature in his state. Lynch said last week he did not think the law is necessary because the state already recognizes civil unions.
If he does sign, his state will join New England neighbors Maine, Vermont, Connecticut and Massachusetts, which all have laws approving same-sex marriages. That would leave Rhode Island, which has same-sex marriage bills pending in its general assembly.
Iowa is the only other state that allows same-sex marriages, after the Iowa state Supreme Court ruled unanimously on April 3 that it is illegal to discriminate against same-sex couples by denying them the right to marry. The first gay marriages in the state took place April 27.
California's state Supreme Court issued a similar ruling in May 2008, after which some 18,000 gay and lesbian couples got married there. But California voters in November approved Proposition 8, which amended the state constitution to ban gay marriage. See which states allow same-sex unions »
The state's high court heard arguments earlier this year about whether Proposition 8 was itself constitutional, but it has not yet issued a verdict.
New York Gov. David Paterson introduced legislation in April to make same-sex marriage legal in his state. A similar bill died in the state Senate in 2007.
The District of Columbia voted Tuesday to recognize same-sex marriages performed elsewhere, but does not itself give marriage licenses to gay or lesbian couples.
In New Hampshire, the House voted 178-167 in favor of the legislation Wednesday after the Senate approved an amended version of the House's original bill last week. The amended version distinguishes between civil and religious marriage. It allows each religion to decide whether to acknowledge same-sex marriage, but extends the option of civil marriage to any two individuals.
Meanwhile, the Human Rights Campaign, a gay and lesbian rights organization, praised Maine's new law.
"This law is simply about making sure that loving, committed couples, and their families, receive equal rights and responsibilities. This is a step that will strengthen Maine families," Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese said in a written statement.
A slim majority of Americans are against legal recognition for same-sex marriage, CNN polling found last month. Fifty-four percent of adults questioned in an April 23-26 nationwide CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll said marriages between gay or lesbian couples should not be recognized as valid, while 44 percent said they should be considered legal.
But there was a huge gap between the opinions of younger and older people, with younger people far more likely to approve of gay marriage.